Battery Webinar The battery power behind the world’s first electric VTOL Jet November 10th, 2023 P. 1

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors This presentation contains certain forw ard-looking statements w ithin the meaning of the federal securities law s, including, but not limited to, statements regarding (i) the Lilium Group’s proposed business and business model, the markets and industry in w hich the Lilium Group operates or intends to operate, (ii) the anticipated timing of the commercialization and launch of the Lilium Group’s business and the expected results of the Lilium Group’s business and business model, including w hen launched in phases, (iii) the application and performance of battery technology in aviation and eVTOL aircraft, (iv) estimates regarding pow er density, life cycle, w eight and other expected specifications of battery technology, (v) the performance of the Lilium Jet, including its projected range, (vi) expectations regarding the manufacture of Lilium’s battery cells, (vii) the scope and benefit of Lilium Group’s procurement and supply chain strategy, (vii) the potential impact of regulations on the Lilium Jet, and (viii) Lilium’s affirmation of previously provided guidance for the second half of 2023, including estimated cash spend. These forw ard-looking statements generally are identified by the w ords “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “target,” “future,” “opportunity,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “w ill,” “w ould,” “w ill be,” “w ill continue,” “w ill likely result,” and similar expressions. Such statements are based on management’s belief or interpretation of information currently available. Forw ard-looking statements are predictions, projections and other statements about future events that are based on management’s current expectations w ith respect to future events and are based on assumptions subject to risks and uncertainties, and as a result are subject to change at any time. The Lilium Group operates and w ill continue to operate in a rapidly changing emerging industry. New risks emerge every day. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not rely on or place undue reliance on these forw ard-looking statements, including any statements regarding w hen or w hether any strategic collaboration betw een Lilium and the respective collaborator w ill be effected, the number, price or timing of any Lilium jets to be acquired (or if any such Lilium jets w ill be acquired at all), the price to be paid therefor and the timing of launch or manner in w hich any proposed eV TOL network or anticipated commercial activities w ill operate, or statements regarding the Lilium Group’s business and product development strategies or certification program. Actual events or results may differ materially from those contained in the projections or forw ard-looking statements. Many factors could cause actual future events to differ materially from the forw ard looking statements in this presentation, including, but not limited to, the follow ing risks: (i) Lilium’s future funding requirements and any inability to raise necessary capital on favorable terms (if at all); (ii) the eVTOL market may not continue to develop, or eV TOL aircraft may not be adopted by the transportation market; (iii) the Lilium Jet may not be certified by transportation and aviation authorities, including the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (“EASA”) or the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”); (iv) the Lilium Jet may not deliver the expected reduction in operating costs or time savings that Lilium anticipates; (v) adverse developments regarding the perceived safety and positive perception of the Lilium Jets, the convenience of expected future Vertiports and Lilium’s ability to effectively market and sell regional air mobility (“RA M”) services and aircraft; (vi) challenges in developing, certifying, manufacturing and launching Lilium’s services in a new industry (urban and regional air transportation services); (vii) a delay in or failure to launch commercial services as anticipated; (viii) the RA M market for eV TOL passenger and goods transport services does not exist, w hether and how it develops is based on assumptions, and the RA M market may not achieve the grow th potential Lilium’s management expects or may grow more slow ly than expected; (ix) if Lilium is unable to adequately control the costs associated w ith pre-launch operations and/or its costs w hen operations are commenced (if ever); (x) difficulties in managing grow th and commercializing operations; (xi) failure to commercialize Lilium’s strategic plans; (xii) any delay in completing testing and certification, and any design changes that may be required to be implemented in order to receive type certification for the Lilium Jet; (xiii) any delays in the development, certification, manufacture and commercialization of the Lilium Jets and related technology, such as battery technology or electric motors; (xiv) any failure of the Lilium Jets to perform as expected or an inability to market and sell our Lilium Jets; (xv) any failure of suppliers to achieve serial production of the proprietary and/or novel softw are, battery technology and other technology systems still in development; (xvi) reliance on third-party suppliers for the provision and development of key emerging technologies, components and materials used in the Lilium Jet, such as the lithium-ion batteries that w ill pow er the jets, a significant number of w hich may be single or limited source suppliers, and the related risk that any of these prospective suppliers or strategic partners may choose not to do business w ith us at all, or may insist on terms that are commercially disadvantageous, and as a result we may have significant difficulty procuring and producing our jets; (xvii) if any of Lilium’s suppliers become financially distressed or go bankrupt, Lilium may be required to provide substantial financial support or take other measures to ensure supplies of components or materials, w hich could increase costs, adversely affect liquidity and/or cause production disruptions; (xviii) third-party air carriers are expected to operate Lilium Netw ork services in the U.S., Europe, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and Brazil, among other countries, using the Lilium Jets, and these third parties, as w ell as Lilium, are subject to substantial regulation and complex laws, and unfavorable changes to, or the third-party air carriers’ or Lilium’s failure to comply w ith, these regulations and/or law s could substantially harm Lilium’s business and operating results; (xix) any inability to operate the Lilium Netw ork services after commercial launch at the anticipated flight rate, on the anticipated routes or w ith the anticipated Vertiports could adversely impact Lilium’s business, financial condition and results of operations; (xx) potential customers may not generally accept the RA M industry or Lilium’s passenger or goods transport services; (xxi) any adverse publicity stemming from any incident involving Lilium or its competitors, or an incident involving any air travel service or unmanned flight based on autonomous technology; (xxii) if competitors obtain certification and commercialize their eVTOL vehicles; (xxiii) business disruptions and other risks arising from COVID-19 and geopolitical events, including the w ar in Ukraine and inflationary pressures, may impact Lilium’s ability to successfully contract w ith its supply chain and have adverse impacts on anticipated costs and commercialization timeline; and/or (xiv) Lilium’s inability to deliver Lilium Jets w ith the specifications and on the timelines anticipated in any non-binding memorandums of understanding (“MOUs”) or or binding contractual agreements w ith customers or suppliers w e have entered into or may enter into in the future. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Forw ard-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forw ard-looking statements, and the Lilium Group assumes no obligation to, and does not intend to, update or revise these forw ard-looking statements, w hether as a result of new information, future events, or otherw ise. The Lilium Group is not giving you any assurance that it w ill achieve its expectations. A further list and description of risks, uncertainties and other matters can be found in sections titled “Risk Factors,” similarly titled sections and elsew here in our filings w ith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), all of w hich are available at www.sec.gov. All forw ard-looking statements attributable to the Lilium Group or any person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Legal Disclaimer p. 1

Legal Disclaimer p. 2 No Representations or Warranties No representations or w arranties, express or implied, are given in, or in respect of, this presentation or the accompanying oral presentation (collectively, this “presentation”). This presentation does not purport to be comprehensive or all-inclusive and is for information purposes only. It does not purport to contain all of the information that may be required to perform a complete analysis of the business or prospects of Lilium N.V. (“Lilium” or the “Company”). To the fullest extent permitted by law , in no circumstances w ill Lilium or its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Lilium Group”) or any of their respective shareholders, affiliates, representatives, partners, directors, officers, employees, advisers or agents be responsible or liable for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or loss of profit arising from the use of this presentation, its contents, its omissions, reliance on the information contained w ithin it, or on opinions communicated in relation thereto or otherw ise arising in connection therew ith. Industry and market data used in this presentation have been obtained from third-party industry publications and sources, as w ell as from research reports prepared for other purposes that the Lilium Group believes are reasonable. The Lilium Group has not independently verified the data obtained from these sources and cannot assure you of the data’s accuracy or completeness, and this data is subject to change. Except as otherw ise required by applicable law , the Lilium Group disclaims any duty to update the information contained in this presentation. No Offer or Solicitation This presentation is not intended to and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to subscribe for or buy or an invitation to purchase or subscribe for any securities in any jurisdiction. Estimates and Data Regarding Battery Cell Technology This presentation contains certain estimates and illustrative data regarding battery cell technology expected to be used in the Lilium Jet that is based on or derived from sources that Lilium reasonably believes to be representative of our expectations for such technology as of the date of this presentation. How ever, the subject matter of this presentation is complex and the performance of battery cell technology can be impacted, in some cases materially, by numerous variables and applicable aircraft operating conditions (e.g., altitude, temperature, aircraft loading, maneuvers, etc.). Additionally, the estimates and illustrative data used in this presentation are based in part on testing and data collected from different generations of battery cells manufactured by various suppliers. While these different generations of battery cells use the same chemistry, and w e believe that w e have applied the data accumulated in a reasonable manner, there may be minor deviations in certain aspects of the manufacture and/or composition of different generations of battery cells that impact performance and the applicability of measurements as betw een different generations. Therefore, actual battery cell technology and performance necessary for the Lilium Jet to achieve our expectations may differ materially from the estimates and illustrative data set forth in this presentation. Description of Key Partnerships This presentation contains descriptions of some of Lilium’s key business partnerships w ith w hom Lilium has entered into feasibility studies, indications of interest, term sheets, memoranda of understanding or other preliminary arrangements. These descriptions are based on the Lilium management team’s discussions and the latest available information and estimates as of the date of this presentation. In each case, these descriptions are subject to negotiation and execution of definitive agreements that may not have been completed as of the date of this presentation and, as a result, the nature, scope and content of these key business partnerships remain subject to change. Financial Information Some of the financial information and data contained in this presentation is unaudited and does not conform to Regulation S-X. Accordingly, such information and data may not be included in, may be adjusted in or may be presented differently in the reports and other documents the Lilium Group may from time-to-time file w ith the SEC. You should review Lilium’s audited financial statements in its filings w ith the SEC for a presentation of Lilium’s historical IFRS financial information. Trademarks This presentation contains the trademarks, service marks, trade names and copyrights of the Lilium Group and other companies, w hich are the property of their respective ow ners. Graphic Representations Aircraft depicted in this presentation have been rendered utilizing computer graphics. The information contained herein is made as of 10 November 2023, and does not reflect any subsequent events.

P. 4 1. Opening 2. Why Battery Powered Flight? 3. What is the power consumption of the Lilium Jet? How did you validate it? 4. You need miracle batteries to supply the power of the Lilium Jet. When will they exist? 5. Would losing a battery pack make the resulting power draw unfeasible? 6. How does the reserve concept work and affect your operating range? 7. Did you test power profiles and missions on a real cell? 8. Did you test the cycle life of your High Silicon Anode cells? 9. Regarding safety, won’t your battery get too heavy once requirements are included? 10. Do you have suppliers for those cells? Will it not take years to set up production? 11. Do you have alternatives/backups from a chemistry and production standpoint? 12. What’s your cell technology roadmap to increase aircraft range in the future? 13. Q&A Agenda Time 45’ 15’

Daniel Wiegand Lilium Founder Chief Engineer for Innovation

Batteries offer highest overall efficiency – any flight that can be done using batteries will be done with batteries Batteries E-Hydrogen E-Fuels (SAF) P. 6 Electricity Price2 ~ $0.36 / kWh Primary Energy Efficiency1 73% 22% 13% Cost / kWh shaft power ~ $0.5 / kWh3 ~ $1.7 / kWh3 ~ $2.8 / kWh Flight Range5 1,100 (2040) – 2,000 km (2050) Up to ~3,400 km Up to ~16,000 km Sources: 1. WTT (World Bank, LBST, IEA), TTW, T&E calculations, Swiss Federal Office for Civil Aviation; 2. Statista; 3. Does not consider material cost for depletion of battery cells or fuel cells; 4. Transportation Research Procedia, Volume 59 (2021) 253-259, Jet A1 Fuel; 5. International Council on Clean Transportation and Lilium internal assessment Covers ~80% of all scheduled commercial flights Kerosene (today) 50% Up to ~16,000 km ~ $0.5 / kWh4 2 WHY BATTERY ELECTRIC FLIGHT?

P. 7 Battery is the major driver of the performance of an eVTOL ​ Source: Lilium Energy [kWh] Power [kW] COSTS SAFETY CYCLE LIFE CARBON FOOTPRINT MATERIALS AVAILABILITY RECYCLABILITY

Our key differentiators Source: Lilium P. 8 Largest Cabin Low Operating Cost Regional Flights

Passengers prefer ducted fans P. 9 Conventional aircraft Electric aircraft 95% of all global airplanes use ducted fans, which are preferred by customers1 for their… Jet (Ducted Fans) Higher Comfort Speed Higher Safety: Failure Containment Lower Noise Low Vibrations Lower Safety: No blade loss containment Higher Vibrations Higher Noise Source: Architectural performance assessment of an eVTOL aircraft; 1. GAMA, JADC, Company information (Airbus, Boeing, Bombardier, Embraer), 2009 – 2019; Lilium Management estimates & company information; Note: Renderings utilizing computer graphics Open Rotor Aesthetics Simplicity: One moving part Complexity: Variable blade pitch mechanism Disadvantage: More Power draw at take-off and landing 3 WHAT IS THE POWER CONSUMPTION? How did you validate the pow er consumption of the a/c?

UNIT LILIUM JET3 PROPELLER eVTOL4 Disc Loading kg/m² 1,150 60 (A) Lift Efficiency kg/kW 1.7 3.6 (B = 1 / A) Shaft Specific Power kW/kg 0.59 0.28 (C) Electric Power Train Efficiency % 87% 87% (D = B / C) Specific Electric Power kW/kg 0.68 0.32 (E) Aircraft weight kg 3,175 3,175 (F = D x E) Electric Hover Power kW 2,147 1,014 P. 10 Simple power requirements can be obtained from general aerospace principles Sources: 1. Hover vertical lift efficiency graph illustration from NASA SP-2000–4517​; 2. For illustration only; 3. Estimate based on Type Certificate jet configuration with a weight of 3,175kg; 4. Propeller-based eVTOL estimate based on peer websites, press clippings and the NASA SP-2000–4517 Electric Hover Power simplified calculation2 ~2x Hover lift efficiency1 [aircraft weight / power] Disc loading [aircraft weight / thrust area] 1.7 kg/kW 1,150 kg/m2 PROPELLER LILIUM JET 3 WHAT IS THE POWER CONSUMPTION? How did you validate the pow er consumption of the a/c?

@Graphics : wip Icon production vs. demo UNIT LILIUM JET3 DEMONSTRATOR RESULTS Disc Loading kg/m² 1,150 1,150 (D) Specific Electric Power kW/kg 0.68 (E) Gross weight kg 3,175 (F = D x E) Electric Hover Power kW 2,147 P. 11 Hover Power simple estimate1 vs. real measurements2 1,9694 Comparing simple power estimates to in-flight measurements Sources: 1. For illustration only, e.g. full calculation would consider global efficiencies; 2. Measurements from Lilium’s demonstrator “Phoenix 2”; 3. Estimate (e) based on Type Certificate jet configuration; 4. Extrapolated number based on Type Certificate jet‘s weight and real flight-testing data Demonstrator total measured Specific Power [kW/kg] – Sea Level, ISA+0 CONCLUSION Measured demonstrator power draw is slightly lower than simplified estimates. 0.62 Hover 0.62 kW/kg Descend 0.61 kW/kg Climb 0.63 kW/kg 3 WHAT IS THE POWER CONSUMPTION? How did you validate the pow er consumption of the a/c?

P. 12 We’re using industry best practice tools to obtain precise power estimates – evidence-based engineering Sources: Lilium flight testing, wind-tunnel testing, in-house measurements, inhouse CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulations, A/C (Aircraft) performance model L F W=mg0 D 4 YEARS of flight testing done FLIGHT TESTING 5 MONTHS of w ind-tunnel testing conducted W IND-TUNNEL INDIVIDUAL All COMPONENTS Compressor maps, e-motor efficiency maps, battery cell characterization MEASUREMENTS 10 of CFD computing FLIGHT TESTING MILLION HOURS Validation Loop Validated A/C performance model − Full missions’ simulation capabilities − Used for customer performance guarantees − Used for certification 3 WHAT IS THE POWER CONSUMPTION? How did you validate the pow er consumption of the a/c?

this P. 13 Hover(less than 20kts speed) makes 9% of mission energy. A propeller would only reduce this to ~4%. However,… We believe Lilium’s Jet design is the best suited eVTOL configuration for regional missions Power profile on a 175 km regional mission ....in Cruise, our engine cross section is better sized and will be significantly more efficient than propeller based eVTOLs. Overall, Lilium‘s Jet consumes less Energy for longer missions Power [kW] Time [min] Sources: Management estimates and company information; 1. Based on the NASA SP-2000–4517 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 2,147 Lilium Jet power requirement in Hover1 3 WHAT IS THE POWER CONSUMPTION? How did you validate the pow er consumption of the a/c?

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 State Of Charge [%] Specific Cell Power [kW/kg] (Measurement1 @30°C, 30 sec pulse) Translating aircraft power draws to cell level power requirements Sources: Lilium; 1. Released test data from Energy Assurance for Ionblox cells at End of Pulse 2.47 kW/kg 2,150 kW in hover 870kg cells in the jet Our requirements at cell level <20% Cruise power SOC limit - forward landing P. 14 Hover power 4 YOU NEED MIRACLE BATTERIES to supply the high pow er of your aircraft in hover flight. When w ill they exist?

P. 15 We have a flying proof that our jet design works with standard Li-ion chemistries Cell1 : LG HG2 Cell type: Cylindrical – 18650 Cell design Year: 2013 Main application: e-Cigarettes First flight: 2019 Discloading: 1,150 kg/m2 Phoenix 1 Sources: Lilium; 1. Module cell at Lilium's warehouse, manufactured by LG (model 18650HG2) 4 YOU NEED MIRACLE BATTERIES to supply the high pow er of your aircraft in hover flight. When w ill they exist?

P. 16 We switched to pouch cells as they have less overhead mass, higher energy density and allow for better packaging efficiency First flight: 2021 Discloading: 1,150 kg/m2 Phoenix 2 Cell1 : KOKAM Li-ion Cell type: Pouch Cell design Year: 2015 Main application: Forklifter Sources: Lilium; 1. Module cell at Lilium's warehouse, manufactured by Kokam (model SLPB98188216P) 4 YOU NEED MIRACLE BATTERIES to supply the high pow er of your aircraft in hover flight. When w ill they exist?

Source: Lilium Engineering Estimates; Ionblox Engineering Estimates; CustomCells Conforming A/C battery cell specifications P. 17 ELEMENT DESCRIPTION Design (California, USA) Investors include Temasek, Applied Materials and Lilium Design Year 2021 1 st Manufacturer (Tübingen, Germany) Form factor Pouch -cell Anode chemistry Silicon dominant Cathode chemistry NMC811 Specific power 5 kW/kg​ @ 50% SOC Specific Energy 330 Wh/kg Capacity 38 Ah Cycle life >800 1C/1C @25 ° C 4 YOU NEED MIRACLE BATTERIES to supply the high pow er of your aircraft in hover flight. When w ill they exist?

Sources: Lilium: Company Information; Swaytronic: Company Information on Sway Graphene HC-LiPo; Tesla: Batemo and EV Database; Farasis P73: Batemo; Amprius; CATL: Company Information and Lilium assessment Tesla Model S Plaid (Graphite Anode) 0 5 10 15 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Swaytronic (Graphite Anode) Lilium (Si Anode) Farasis (eVTOL cell) (Graphite Anode) CATL (Li Anode) Amprius (SI Anode) Our cell performance is in line with current high-performance chemistry specs Cell Specific Power at 50% State of Charge [kW/kg] Energy Density [Wh/kg] “This would be a miracle” P. 18 4 YOU NEED MIRACLE BATTERIES to supply the high pow er of your aircraft in hover flight. When w ill they exist?

By the time Lilium's Jet will enter the market, Silicon Anode Technology will be state of the art in premium automotive Sources: Lilium; https://spectrum.ieee.org/silicon-anode-battery “[…] General Motors and OneD Battery Sciences in Palo Alto, Calif., are putting OneD’s silicon nanotechnology into GM’s Ultium battery cells.” “The Age of Silicon Is Here…for Batteries. The mainstay material of electronics is now yielding better energy storage. “[…] Sila Nanotechnologies’ silicon anode, […] will be in the Mercedes G-Class SUV by 2026.” “Group14 Technologies, in Woodinville, Wash., should have its silicon battery setup in a Porsche EV by next year.” P. 19 4 YOU NEED MIRACLE BATTERIES to supply the high pow er of your aircraft in hover flight. When w ill they exist?

Our aircraft has 10 independent battery packs providing sufficient power in case of failure Sources: Lilium Engineering Estimates x10 battery packs In case of failure of 1 pack, power increases by +11% across the rest of the 9 independent packs P. 20 5 ISN’T THE POWER DRAW OF YOUR AIRCRAFT GROWING TREMENDOUSLY IN FAILURE CASES such as losing a battery pack making the resulting pow er draw unfeasible?

All battery safety requirements included − Crash protection − Cell fire containment − Flight loads − Redundant power distribution − Dissimilar and redundant battery management − Traceability and Process Control All battery safety requirements included for both European and U.S. certification P. 21 Note: Rendering utilizing computer graphics 9 WHAT ABOUT SAFETY? Your battery might get too heavy once all safety requirements are incorporated

− The FAA have a 30-minute energy reserve requirement for VFR day and 45-minute for VFR night. − U.S. and Global industry are pushing to converge towards performance-based framework for energy reserves and the SFAR in general. − Lilium’s commentaries submitted on August 12, 2023, pending FAA next step on SFAR − Contingency − Final Reserve − Alternates with Critical Failures − Evidence required that the pilot and the A/C can consistently execute the landing procedures − Stricter than any other operating framework for helicopters (vertiport landing in all cases) − Lilium‘s operating range target of 175km built upon the EASA Part IAM reserves Applicable reserve concepts to our A/C Regulation Rules extract Analogies How do we comply? − Part IAM (Innovative Air Mobility Operations) − SFARs (Special Federal Aviation Regulations) Hover time − NO specification − Part IAM is a performance-based framework − NO specification − Not performance-based Sources: Lilium; EASA; FAA - Federal Register :: Integration of Powered-Lift: Pilot Certification and Operations; Miscellaneous Amendments Related to Rotorcraft and Airplanes Public comment closed on 13.08.2023 P. 22 6 WHAT IS THE RESERVE CONCEPT YOU ARE USING and w hat is the resulting operating range w hich is left using this reserve concept? Is it agreed w ith the regulator and w hat if the regulator imposes a three-minute hover time on this segment? RELEASED DRAFT

US applicants asking for a performance-based approach: General Aviation Manufacturers Association “GAMA advocates for the adoption of appropriate operating rules based on each aircraft's performance characteristics, highlighting the need to modernize legacy fuel-based energy reserves and reconsider the requirement for dual control variants. ” “…it is suggested to introduce the possibility to have more practical performance-based reserve requirements also considering the type of energy used for propulsion that would guarantee similar safety margins considering the particular concept of intended operations.” “Archer recommends that the FAA consider performance-based requirements for energy reserves, as well as other range and endurance related criteria that align with the capabilities and intended operations of the aircraft.” “BETA recommends the FAA revise the SFAR rules §91.151, §91.167, §135.209, and §135.223 to add an option for use of a performance-based reserve that can be determined based on the capability of the aircraft and the intended flight plan.” “Eve recommends the FAA introduces in the SFAR more practical performance-based energy reserve requirements applied for routes planning definition, considering the type of energy used by the powered-lift aircraft which guarantee equivalent level of safety margins regarding the intended concept of operation applied for each type of aircraft (shorter range, alternate landing sites, energy capacity, performance capabilities). “ “Joby champions performance-based reserve frameworks that bolster mission-specific range and endurance hazard evaluations.” “Revise the existing fuel reserve requirement to a performance-based standard for powered-lift to maintain an equivalent level of safety. “ European applicants asking for a performance-based approach: “Language should be included such as "as determined by the Administrator" that would permit future operators to use performance-based reserve solutions.” “Given the variation of aircraft designs within the powered-lift category, we encourage the FAA to take a performance-based approach, setting fuel requirements based on the performance and the type of operation of the specific aircraft” Sources: Lilium; Part IAM EASA; Federal Register :: Integration of Powered-Lift: Pilot Certification and Operations; Miscellaneous Amendments Related to Rotorcraft and Airplanes P. 23 The aerospace industry is broadly requesting performance-based reserve requirements to the FAA 6 WHAT IS THE RESERVE CONCEPT YOU ARE USING and w hat is the resulting operating range w hich is left using this reserve concept? Is it agreed w ith the regulator and w hat if the regulator imposes a three-minute hover time on this segment?

Deep dive on EASA Part IAM and implications for Lilium Sources: Lilium; Part IAM EASA P. 24 A B Contingency At touchdow n in B the aircraft must have 10% of the total trip energy left. This is equivalent to an additional 45 sec of hover. 3° – 7° LDP (Landing Decision Point) Final Reserve Balked Landing and Diversion w ith forward landing 25 sec hover 200fpm descent Part IAM Reserves Requirements Contigency Final Reserve 10% of trip energy at touchdown Ability to balk landing and divert 6 WHAT IS THE RESERVE CONCEPT YOU ARE USING and w hat is the resulting operating range w hich is left using this reserve concept? Is it agreed w ith the regulator and w hat if the regulator imposes a three-minute hover time on this segment?

− Mixed reality 3D simulator with motion platform − Validated control laws and representative cockpit − Night, rain and wind simulations − Provides statistical evidence for landing performance Validated landing performance in ~750 landings with different pilots Sources: Lilium P. 25 Pilots consistently execute landing in <25 sec. hovering, leaving +45 sec. Part IAM hover reserve 6 WHAT IS THE RESERVE CONCEPT YOU ARE USING and w hat is the resulting operating range w hich is left using this reserve concept? Is it agreed w ith the regulator and w hat if the regulator imposes a three-minute hover time on this segment?

P. 26 We’ve been intensively testing our cells based on reference flight profile (1/2) Source: Lilium inhouse testing of cell performance Iterative testing of max range missions based on reference flight profile minV Depth of Discharge (%) Min. Voltage vs Depth of Discharge Voltage (V) First Flight Cell minV Min. Voltage at End of Landing vs Flight Length Voltage (V) 175 First Flight Cell Flight Length [km] CONCLUSION Subtracting PART IAM reserves yields 175 km operational range (achieved in tests) 7 DID YOU TEST MISSION POWER PROFILES ON A REAL CELL?

88% capacity retention over 809 full cycles Key highlights − Rate: 1C / 1C − Depth of discharge: 100% − Voltage: 2.5 – 4.2 Volts − Format: Full Size Pouch P. 27 Our cells show similar cycle life as standard Li-ion cells’ Ionblox cell testing – Cycle capacity summary 8 USUALLY, SILICON ANODE CELLS HAVE SWELLING AND HENCE DIE QUICKLY. Did you test cycle life of your cells? Sources: Lilium; Idaho National Laboratory

P. 28 Cycle Life increases with real flight profiles Sources: Lilium inhouse testing of cells performance − Charge rate: 2C (30 min charge) − Charge End: 100% − Profile: Reference Flight Profile − Peak Power: 2.9 kW/kg − Capacity check: every 50 cycles − Flight Distance: ~130km − No adverse effects on cycle life found from high power pulses at take-off and landing and the fast charge − 88% capacity retention over 1450 flight cycles (business case target is 800 cycles) − Avoiding discharge to 0% due to reserves at landing increases cycle life significantly 8 USUALLY, SILICON ANODE CELLS HAVE SWELLING AND HENCE DIE QUICKLY. Did you test cycle life of your cells? Cell n°1 Cell n°2

Deep dive on our production ramp-up with CustomCells Sources: Lilium; CustomCells P. 29 Key highlights − Dedicated production line for Lilium − Shipping cells every week − Prototype production started in 2021 − Compliant with aerospace traceability and conformity − State-of the art electrode and cell production machine 10 DO YOU HAVE SUPPLIERS OF THOSE CELLS? Will it not take years to set up production for those new cells?

Lilium’s cells can be manufactured on standard, available manufacturing lines Sources: Lilium management estimates & company information Pow der Mixing Slurry Mixing Coating Calen-daring Sitting Punching Pow der Mixing Slurry Mixing Coating Calen-daring Pre-Li Sitting Punching Z-Fold Stacking Stack Taping Tab Welding Stack Bagging Pouch Forming Pouch Sealing Electrolyte Filling Electrolyte Soaking Degas 1 Formation 1 Hot Press OCV Check Degas 2 Formation 2 Final QC Cell Selection Labelling Packaging & Shipping + CATHODE extra-step P. 30 10 DO YOU HAVE SUPPLIERS OF THOSE CELLS? Will it not take years to set up production for those new cells?

Deep dive on Pre-Lithiation: improving cell capacity and cycle life Sources: Lilium; CustomCells; Applied Materials Pre-Lithiation set-up at CustomCells production line (illustrative) Calendaring P. 31 − Simple “Calendaring” process − Pre-Lithiation can be done with most Li-Ion Chemistries and increases Energy and Cycle Life − Si Anode can be used without Pre-Lithiation but with lower capacity − Currently many high performance cells in development using Pre-Lithiation Transfer of Lithium from PET foil to Anode Delivers Li-coated PET-Foil 10 DO YOU HAVE SUPPLIERS OF THOSE CELLS? Will it not take years to set up production for those new cells?

We are de-risking our battery production thanks to a multi-sourcing approach Sources: Lilium; CustomCells; Inobat; Gotion P. 32 New partnership with We have two credible partners for battery manufacturing Primary cell production with − Inobat to produce Lilium battery cells, with support from Inobat investor Gotion High-Tech − Gotion High-Tech is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of battery cells, contracted for 80% of Volkswagen Group’s future battery demand − Inobat production due to start in early 2024 − Prototype cells production of the Ionblox technology in increasing numbers − Collaboration towards consistent aerospace grade quality (supported by ) 10 DO YOU HAVE SUPPLIERS OF THOSE CELLS? Will it not take years to set up production for those new cells?

Step 2: Achieve up to 400 Wh/kg − Current Si Anode technology − High Nickel Cathode such as NMC9XX − Big trend in automotive to go to high Nickel − Contains less Cobalt − Provides more energy − Existing production process and chemistry family Step 1: Achieve up to 350 Wh/kg − Existing Chemistry − Mechanical improvements to cell overhead weight Battery performance improvement roadmap P. 33 Incremental energy increase using proven technologies, existing partners, and manufacturing lines We are continuously investing together with our partners to stay on the cutting edge of battery technology Target 2026 Target 2028 12 WHAT’S YOUR CELL TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TO INCREASE AIRCRAFT RANGE IN THE FUTURE? Sources: Lilium; CustomCells; Inobat; Gotion

P. 34 Technology enables larger regional electric aircraft with runway take-off and landing capability, replacing highly carbon intense short-haul flights (e.g., 50-100 seat airliners, business jets, cargo and military aircraft) eCTOL (electric conventional take-off and landing) Increase range of existing eVTOL platform by leveraging battery improvements eVTOL (electric vertical take-off and landing) 12 WHAT’S YOUR CELL TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP TO INCREASE AIRCRAFT RANGE IN THE FUTURE? Energy density improvement1 Note: Targeted aircraft development vision through 2040 estimates based on Company analysis; The illustration of future aircraft capabilities is forward-looking, subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond Lilium’s control and are based upon assumptions with respect to future decisions and events, which are subject to change. Actual results will vary & those variations may be material. Nothing in this presentation should be regarded as a representation by any person that future aircraft capabilities will be achieved as described herein. 1. Estimate based on Physicsworld and Lithium-ion batteries historical improvement We believe energy density will increase by ~4.5% p.a. and Lilium capabilities will enable a wider portfolio of electric aircraft 2025E 2030E ~4.5% p.a.

The battery dominates eVTOL performance Our battery is a clear competitive advantage and moat to our eVTOL technology. P. 35

Q&A